Updated 2026-11-02

Is there a messaging app that can't be hacked?

Short answer: no, and you should be wary of any app that says otherwise.

The encryption in serious messengers has never been broken in practice. Attackers don't need to break it. They go around it: through the phone, through mistakes in the app, through records of who talks to whom, and through people. The right question is which app leaves attackers the fewest ways in, and which one can prove what it claims.

The four ways messages actually get exposed

1. The device

If spyware is running on your phone, it can read your screen and your keyboard. End-to-end encryption protects messages while they travel, not on a compromised device. Commercial spyware has been used against journalists and activists on fully updated phones. No messaging app can fix this, and an app that claims to is not being straight with you.

2. Mistakes in the code

The maths behind modern encryption is sound; implementations are where things go wrong. Home-made cryptography, unreviewed code and bugs in how keys are handled have exposed messages in real apps. This is why open source code, use of audited libraries and independent audits matter more than which cipher a product names.

3. Metadata: who, when and how often

Even when nobody can read your messages, records of who you talk to, when and from where can reveal a great deal. Former NSA and CIA director Michael Hayden put it bluntly in 2014:

“We kill people based on metadata.”

An app that needs your phone number, keeps your contact list on its servers or logs your connections holds exactly this kind of record, even with perfect encryption.

4. People and accounts

Phone numbers can be hijacked through SIM swaps. People can be tricked into scanning a link that adds the attacker's device, or into sharing recovery codes. A contact's identity can be faked if nobody checks it. Good apps make these attacks harder and make verification easy.

What to look for instead

How the main apps compare

Facts checked on 2026-11-02 from each project's own announcements and independent reporting (sources below). No app wins every row.

Checked 2026-11-02SignalSimpleXSessionThreemaWhatsAppTelegramDead Safe
End-to-end encrypted by defaultYesYesYesYesYesNo (opt-in “secret chats”, one-to-one only)Yes
Phone number needed to sign upYes (numberless sign-up in beta, Sep 2026)NoNoNoYesYesNo
Permanent account identifierPhone number, optional usernameNoneRandom account IDThreema IDPhone numberPhone number, optional usernameNone
Forward secrecyYesYesNo (removed 2021; v2 in development)Yes (Ibex protocol; initially opt-in per contact)YesSecret chats onlyYes
Post-quantum key agreementYes (PQXDH 2023, plus post-quantum ratchet 2025)Yes (direct chats, since 2024)No (planned in v2)No (stated goal)Unclear (no official confirmation found)Not announcedYes (hybrid, at connection and on every reply)
Hides your IP address from its serversNoPartly (private message routing; Tor optional)Yes (onion-routed network)NoNoNoNot yet (Tor planned)
PriceFree (donations)FreeFree (Pro tier in beta)Paid appFreeFree (Premium tier)Free; Pro payable by cash in the post
Second profile for forced unlocksNoHidden profilesNoNoNoNoYes
Independent security auditYesYesYesYesNot assessed hereNot assessed hereNo (planned before 1.0)

Sources

  1. Signal: Quantum resistance and the Signal Protocol (2023)
  2. Signal: Signal Protocol and Post-Quantum Ratchets (Oct 2025)
  3. Signal: Keep your phone number private with usernames (2024)
  4. Privacy Guides: Signal enables phone-number-less registration in beta (Sep 2026)
  5. SimpleX: protocol overview
  6. SimpleX v5.7: quantum-resistant encryption by default in direct chats (Apr 2024)
  7. Session: Protocol V2, PFS and post-quantum (2025)
  8. Privacy Guides: Session adds PFS, PQE and other improvements (Dec 2025)
  9. Threema: New communication protocol "Ibex"
  10. Kaspersky: Telegram and secret chats
  11. ABC News: Ex-NSA chief: "We kill people based on metadata" (2014)

Where Dead Safe stands

Dead Safe was built around the checklist above. Each of these statements is backed by an automated test in our source code (published before launch):

And, just as important, this is what Dead Safe cannot do yet. We publish it because you can't make a good decision without it:

Practical steps, whatever app you use

Frequently asked questions

Can end-to-end encrypted messages be hacked?

Not by breaking the encryption: the algorithms used by serious messengers have no known practical attack. Messages are exposed in other ways: spyware on the phone, a stolen unlocked device, bugs in the app, or someone tricked into connecting to an attacker. Metadata such as who talks to whom can also leak even when content does not.

Is there a messaging app that cannot be hacked?

No. Any app that promises it can never be hacked is promising something no one can deliver, because the phone it runs on can be compromised. The useful question is which app leaves the fewest openings and can prove what it claims.

What is the most secure messaging app?

It depends on what you need to protect. Signal is the strongest widely used choice. SimpleX and Dead Safe need no phone number or account identifier at all. Session hides your IP address through its own network but currently lacks forward secrecy. Dead Safe combines no identifiers, post-quantum key agreement, anonymous cash payment and a second profile for forced unlocks, and publishes a test for every claim; it has not yet had an independent audit.

Can the police or governments read encrypted messages?

If they get your unlocked phone, or install spyware on it, yes. If they only intercept network traffic or ask the provider, an end-to-end encrypted app gives them no message content. What the provider can hand over is metadata, which is why apps that collect less of it matter.

Does Dead Safe store my messages?

Messages wait on the relay, encrypted and padded, only until your device collects them, and for at most 14 days. On your device they are stored encrypted under a key made from your passphrase.